A Problem of Reconstruction: A Short Fictional Illustration

Let us imagine, for the nonce, that someone decided to reconstruct the religion of a certain group of my ancestors: the Puritans.

Now, this is a more recent period of history than most reconstructions, and there’s a lot of information to be had. One can dig into the efforts to reform the Church of England, associated anti-Catholicism, persecution of Quakers, Calvinism, threads of congregational thought, debates over scriptural interpretation, the importance of preaching, the nature of the family, the embrace of marital sexuality in opposition to the value of virginity as primary, the significance of education, and all these things in the record. One can read the actual works of John Calvin, of William Bradshaw (who adopted the term as self-identification and wrote English Puritanisme containeung the maine opinions of the rigidest of those called Puritanes in the realme of England), William Ames, or Cotton Mather. One can, in short, imagine constructing that “city on the hill” in proper accord with Puritan principles.

There is, of course, a fly in this ointment, with this vision of perfect reconstruction.

Puritan religion didn’t die out in New England. So there is a continuous tradition of descent from the separatists who built all those little white churches to, often, the current occupants of those self-same little white churches, with their plain glass windows and steeples with clock towers.

Those churches are currently, for the most part, inhabited by these most popular theological descendants of the Puritans:

The Unitarian Universalists and the United Church of Christ.

The past is a foreign country: they do things differently there.

– L. P. Hartley

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “A Problem of Reconstruction: A Short Fictional Illustration

  1. odeliaivy says:

    So what is the value of reconstruction to you? I have been interested in this question for some time in a slightly off way. I wonder if reading of a God or Goddess and knowing the facts about them is more interesting than actually worshipping them. Or if living with the presence of them in life is more interesting than having any reading to back up gnosis. I suspect everyone has a balance that fits them best. It is interesting to me how that balance is struck.

    Very thought provoking illustration!

  2. […] about the question of the unrecoverability of ancient Mystery religion. I wrote, a bit whimsically, on the difference between ‘reconstructed’ worldviews and the actual organic evolutions o…. I’ve written about applying information from scattered times and places without really […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s